|
Rule 16 Conferences, Discovery
Disputes, Settlement Conferences
This web site will address only those matters which are routinely
referred to me in civil cases. Other areas, such as trials on
consent of the parties, present few special issues and will be
dealt with ad hoc.
Civil cases are routinely referred to me to perform a Rule
16 conference, resolve discovery disputes, and conduct a settlement
conference.
Rule 16 Conferences
Attorneys must confer and submit a Joint Report of Parties prior
to the scheduled conference. A form for use in that regard may
be downloaded (here), and
is also included as an attachment to the Local Rules. If the
case is a class action, click (here)
for the form. The report must be jointly submitted -- one report
bearing the original signature of each attorney of record.
The conference will occur even though the joint report has
been timely submitted. Absent a specific waiver by the Court,
the conference will occur.
The Scheduling and Discovery Conference will be telephonic.
Plaintiff is responsible for placing the call. Occasionally,
an attorney will be present at the courthouse at the time the
conference is scheduled. When that happens, counsel should simply
come to my chambers and participate in that manner. The attorney
who is most familiar with the case should participate.
The purpose of the Rule 16 Conference is twofold: (1) to identify
and plan to deal with novel or difficult discovery issues; and
(2) to schedule a settlement conference. Counsel should be prepared
to discuss each at the conference.
In all but a very few cases, a settlement conference will be
set well before discovery closes. During the scheduling conference,
we will identify the least amount of discovery which is a necessary
predicate to a successful settlement conference. Expert discovery,
for example, is rarely necessary or useful prior to a settlement
conference. Several cases have been so thoroughly investigated
by both sides by the time suit is filed in federal court that
no additional discovery is needed prior to a settlement conference.
In those instances, a settlement conference will be set as soon
as possible, many times within two weeks.
Return to Top of Page
Discovery Disputes
Shortly after the case is at issue, counsel will receive my
"Order Regarding Discovery." This order is self-explanatory.
Motions to compel discovery are handled telephonically and without
written motions or briefs. When a discovery dispute arises which
the parties are unable to resolve informally, the party seeking
discovery shall schedule a telephone conference call between
me and all parties contesting the particular discovery. The
timing for the conference must be confirmed by either Mary Adams,
(618) 439-7750, or Karen Metheney, (618) 439-7754.
If written discovery is involved, the interrogatories or requests
in dispute should be faxed to me in advance of the teleconference.
My FAX number is: (618) 439-6325. Letters from
counsel containing arguments are neither helpful nor desired.
I will normally rule on the dispute during the teleconference.
In this manner, discovery disputes are regularly resolved within
a week of occurrence.
Disputes which arise during depositions should be addressed
immediately via a phone conference. My chambers' number is:
(618) 439-7750.
The non-prevailing party in a discovery dispute will bear the
cost of the conference call.
Return to Top of Page
Settlement Conferences
As mentioned above, settlement conference dates are selected
during the Rule 16 conference. Typically, settlement conferences
are set at 9:15 a.m. Because it is impossible to gauge in advance
how long a settlement conference will last, I try to keep the
rest of the day open. Attorneys and parties attending the settlement
conferences should do the same. There are few rules attending
these conferences, but they are firm and will not be deviated
from except in very unusual circumstances. They are:
*Lead counsel must attend.
*The parties must attend. A named individual defendant need
not attend if covered by liability insurance. In that case,
an insurance representative with full authority to negotiate
and settle the case must be here. This is an area which causes
trouble. Frequently, an insurance representative appears with
authority to a certain dollar limit. Most of the time, that
authority is insufficient to do the job. It then becomes necessary
to track down by telephone the person who really has the authority
so that negotiations can be completed. This is disruptive and
inefficient. A good rule of thumb for defendants trying to select
a proper representative is to bring a person who can agree to
any sum demanded by plaintiff without resort to the telephone.
Another problem arises in employment cases. Defendants should
not bring anyone who had any relevant input in the employment
decision(s) which gave rise to the underlying lawsuit. In some
cases, due to the size of the defendant company, this is unavoidable.
Where it can be avoided, however, it must be. A good rule of
thumb is to leave behind anyone who might testify at trial concerning
the reasons for the employment action taken. Corporate counsel
are another group typically lacking objectivity. They are frequently
consulted prior to employment actions and are part of that mix.
Leave them at home if possible.
Municipalities, counties, and other public entities represented
by boards are often sued in federal court. On many occasions,
a quorum of a governing board has appeared at a settlement conference.
This is good as long as Open Meetings Act laws are not violated.
Counsel are urged to take appropriate precautions.
Settlement statements are not filed with the Clerk. The parties
should send their settlement statements directly to Judge Frazier's chambers
by facsimile: (618)439-6325.
*If during preparation for a settlement conference a defendant
determines that negotiations will be futile, then that defendant
must contact my office immediately. Defendants who appear with
nothing but nuisance money may find themselves paying the cost
of plaintiff(s) and plaintiff(s)' attorneys to attend.
Click (here) for a copy of the Settlement
Statement of Attorney
Return to Top of Page
Hon. Philip M. Frazier
United States Magistrate Judge
Southern District of Illinois
U.S. Courthouse
301 West Main St. - Suite 203
Benton, Illinois 62812
Telephone: (618) 439-7750 Facsimile: (618) 439-6325
Staff:
Mary T. Adams, Judicial Assistant
Telephone: (618) 439-7750 Facsimile: (618) 439-6325
Karen Stallman, Law Clerk
Telephone: (618) 439-7752 Facsimile: (618) 439-6325
Karen R. Metheney, Courtroom Deputy
Telephone: (618) 439-7754 Facsimile: (618) 439-6325
Return to Judges
|